<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=US-ASCII" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META name=GENERATOR content="MSHTML 9.00.8112.16457"></HEAD>
<BODY style="FONT-FAMILY: Arial; COLOR: #000000; FONT-SIZE: 10pt" id=role_body
bottomMargin=7 leftMargin=7 rightMargin=7 topMargin=7><FONT id=role_document
color=#000000 size=2 face=Arial>
<DIV>In a message dated 1/29/2013 9:16:48 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,
jadney@vwtype3.org writes:</DIV>
<DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 10px; MARGIN-LEFT: 10px">
<DIV><FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" color=#000000 size=2
face=Arial>On 29 Jan 2013 at 19:31, Brent Bottolfson wrote:<BR><BR>> I'm
not sure about the side windows, but the windshield seals ISP sells <BR>>
now are not WCM seals. Big difference in the quality between them. I
<BR>> took some side by side pics of them maybe a year ago and posted them
on TS.<BR><BR>Which do you think are better, and why?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>I prefer the WCM seals. They look like a more quality piece, and have
longer lips for their sealing surfaces. The ISP seals look like someone was
trying to save some runner on them, by making the lips shorter. That's just my
experience with them though. I'll still buy the WCM seals before I'll get the
ISP seals (at least the Cal Look version). I do know the WCM Cal look seals
last a long time though, as Sue's car has them still on it, from when they
were installed back in 1991 (still no cracking). :O Note; that car sits
outside year round, and has never had any "rubber dressing" put on those
seals. They were simply installed with soapy water, and wiped clean after
installation.
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT lang=0 size=2 face=Arial FAMILY="SANSSERIF" PTSIZE="10">Bob 65
Notch S w/Sunroof and IRS aka Krusty<BR>64 T-34 Ghia aka Wolfie<BR>71
Square-vert under
construction</FONT></DIV></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV></FONT></BODY></HTML>