<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=US-ASCII" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META name=GENERATOR content="MSHTML 10.00.9200.16635"></HEAD>
<BODY id=role_body style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial; COLOR: #000000"
bottomMargin=7 leftMargin=7 rightMargin=7 topMargin=7><FONT id=role_document
color=#000000 size=2 face=Arial>
<DIV>In a message dated 7/14/2013 5:21:19 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
jadney@vwtype3.org writes:</DIV>
<DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 10px; MARGIN-LEFT: 10px">
<DIV><FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" color=#000000 size=2
face=Arial>I really recommend taking the breather back one generation earlier.
<BR>It's simpler and I think it is likely to save you lots of
headaches.</FONT></DIV><FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent"
color=#000000 size=2 face=Arial></FONT></BLOCKQUOTE>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 10px; MARGIN-LEFT: 10px"><FONT
style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" color=#000000 size=2 face=Arial>I agree.
Plus, you can then close off the ports in the heads, and not have to worry
about oil being forced past the large cooling fan (like what happens on 72 and
73 engines with 2 plugs on the breather AND converted to carbs).
<DIV>It's a simpler system, and less likely to have vacuum leaks, or run a
bunch of hoses around the engine to make it work.<BR>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT lang=0 size=2 face=Arial FAMILY="SANSSERIF" PTSIZE="10">Bob 65
Notch S w/Sunroof and IRS aka Krusty<BR>64 T-34 Ghia aka Wolfie<BR>71
Square-vert under
construction</FONT></DIV></DIV></FONT></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV></FONT></BODY></HTML>