<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=US-ASCII" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META name=GENERATOR content="MSHTML 10.00.9200.16635"></HEAD>
<BODY id=role_body style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial; COLOR: #000000"
bottomMargin=7 leftMargin=7 rightMargin=7 topMargin=7><FONT id=role_document
color=#000000 size=2 face=Arial>
<DIV>In a message dated 8/10/2013 1:14:28 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
jadney@vwtype3.org writes:</DIV>
<DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 10px; MARGIN-LEFT: 10px">
<DIV><FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" color=#000000 size=2
face=Arial>On 9 Aug 2013 at 18:12, Soren Jacobsen wrote:<BR><BR>> My parts
book (updated through December 1969) shows very clearly that<BR>> one is
for early cars and one is for late. It also shows them both<BR>>
positioned at the rear end of the bowden tube. <BR><BR>The location
shown in the drawing is not always where it goes on the <BR>car. My microfilm
shows the same thing your book shows. My experience <BR>is mostly with '68 and
later cars, and all of those had both boots, <BR>front and rear, as shown on
the photos you posted.<BR><BR>Yes, looks like another error in the parts
list.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Yes, my 72 dated parts book calls out the same thing. So, I guess it
wasn't updated.
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT lang=0 size=2 face=Arial FAMILY="SANSSERIF" PTSIZE="10">Bob 65
Notch S w/Sunroof and IRS aka Krusty<BR>64 T-34 Ghia aka Wolfie<BR>71
Square-vert under
construction</FONT></DIV></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV></FONT></BODY></HTML>