<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=US-ASCII" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META name=GENERATOR content="MSHTML 8.00.6001.23852"></HEAD>
<BODY style="FONT-FAMILY: Arial; COLOR: #000000; FONT-SIZE: 10pt" id=role_body
bottomMargin=7 leftMargin=7 rightMargin=7 topMargin=7><FONT id=role_document
color=#000000 size=2 face=Arial>
<DIV>In a message dated 8/27/2016 7:59:02 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
dave@hallvw.clara.co.uk writes:</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BORDER-LEFT: blue 2px solid; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px"><FONT
style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" color=#000000 size=2 face=Arial>Sorry to
continue the myth, if it is a myth, but someone on here thought to<BR>check
the timing with the light on #1 lead, and then compared it with timing<BR>on
#3 and said he did indeed find retardation on #3. It's easy enough
to<BR>do that, but I've never remembered to check it yet. Since the
reason I've<BR>heard (only hearsay) is to do with the oil-cooler position, I
don't see why<BR>it wouldn't apply to all Type 3s if it applied to
any.</FONT></BLOCKQUOTE>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>I was just going off what Russ told me/us years ago.
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT lang=0 size=2 face=Arial FAMILY="SANSSERIF" PTSIZE="10">Bob 65 Notch
S with Sunroof</FONT></DIV></DIV></FONT></BODY></HTML>